Asia Open: Markets Bet on What Hasn’t Happened—Yet

This is still an oil-driven narrative, not yet a full-blown risk-off spiral

Oil didn’t so much explode at the Asia open as it recalibrated to the weekend’s geopolitical static—punching higher, yes, but still holding below last week’s 13% moonshot top. The price action felt less like panic and more like a market that’s adjusting its exposure, repricing risk without fully pulling the fire alarm—yet.

Equity futures in Asia ticked lower as the region’s colossal oil importers started to feel the burn from crude’s early surge. Higher energy costs aren’t just noise—they’re a direct hit to margins and macro. U.S. futures opened soft, but in classic fashion, the dip-buyers clocked in on schedule—muscle memory kicking in, conditioned by a decade of “crisis-that-wasn’t” setups. They’re still betting that this, too, blows over before it bites.

So far, the market’s relief, or lack of major sell-off in Asia, hinges on what hasn’t happened. Iran’s military hasn’t flexed the way many feared. The Strait remains navigable. And most importantly, the U.S. hasn’t been dragged into the desert weeds—yet.

But the macro board is anything but clean. Traders are juggling this alongside tariff tremors from Trump, trade rerouting noise, the ever-festering Russia-Ukraine gridlock, and U.S. domestic unrest. And now the G-7 is in play, with Trump inbound for what could either be a backchannel deal-fest or a volatility grenade.

Trump, true to form, arrives holding both gasoline and a fire extinguisher. He vetoes a decapitation strike on Khamenei—then goes on ABC to say the U.S. might get involved if things escalate. At the same time, he’s talking peace deals between Iran and Israel like it’s a Mar-a-Lago property dispute.

For markets, that isn’t clarity—it’s institutionalized chaos. And traders hate chaos; they can’t model.

This is still an oil-driven narrative, not yet a full-blown risk-off spiral. But the fuse is lit. If crude closes the week above $80, equity traders will stop ignoring it, and inflation hedges will become the trade du jour. Until then, this is the calm before markets decide if this is just another fade or something that finally sticks.

Oil’s War Premium Is Back—but How Sticky Is It?

Oil opened the week on edge as Israel and Iran kept lobbing shots across each other’s borders, but despite the weekend fireworks, crude flows remain uninterrupted. Still, the market is jittery—for good reason. The real fear isn’t the tit-for-tat strikes; it’s what happens if Tehran makes a move on the Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly a fifth of the world’s oil supply sails daily. One hostile naval maneuver or a rogue drone in the wrong shipping lane, and the market could rip on reflex alone. Futures suggest traders see this as a short-term flare-up, not a structural supply shock, but those betting on a quick mean-reversion may be playing with fire. OPEC’s touted 5 million b/d of spare capacity looks good on paper, but most of it’s locked inside the same geographic trapdoor—no good if tankers can’t exit the Gulf.

Currently, Brent is carving out a higher floor, likely settling into a $73–79 short-term range as risk premiums are priced back into the market. Last week’s knee-jerk rally added as much as 13% to crude before giving back some of the gains, a telltale sign that traders are hedging for tail risks while still doubting the worst-case scenario. The oil desk is focused on three potential flashpoints: Will Iran escalate beyond the symbolic, ie blockade the Strait? Could this conflict drag in proxies and patrons? And does the U.S.—even rhetorically—get pulled into the frame? Any one of these is a bullish spark. All three at once, and you’re looking at triple-digit crude.

Iran’s 3.3 million barrels per day (b/d) output and roughly 1.7 million b/d in exports are currently flowing. Still, if those barrels go offline, it wipes out the expected Q4 surplus and sets the stage for an undersupplied market heading into year-end. That would lift Brent closer to $80, even without broader disruption. But should the Strait get blocked, OPEC’s reserves are moot, SPRs get tapped, and the only thing left to balance the books is demand destruction—at a much higher price point. Meanwhile, the LNG market isn’t immune. Qatar, the world's third-largest exporter, sends all its gas through the same chokepoint. Any disturbance would pit Europe and Asia against each other in a bidding war that reopens old scars from the 2022 crunch. For now, the market is walking the edge—but everyone knows one misstep could send it into a sprint.

The tape is carrying a ~$10/bbl geopolitical premium right now, despite no barrels lost and no tankers being hit. But when 20- 30% of the world’s seaborne crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz, the market doesn’t need actual disruption—just the threat is enough to keep the market bid

Still, base case pricing suggests the street expects the heat to simmer, not boil. Brent has room to stretch, but Q4 reverts to bearish fundamentals unless something truly breaks. Ironically, nat gas may wear more of the damage short-term—Israel’s 22 bcm annual output is already taking hits with the Leviathan field offline. If the escalation spills into the eastern Med, LNG and pipeline rerouting headaches are next on the board.

---

Gold Flirts With Glory as War Risk and Trump Tariffs Collide

Gold is charging toward record territory again, trading just shy of the $3,500 handle in early Asia as the Middle East slips further into chaos. The weekend's barrage of missiles between Israel and Iran didn’t just rattle nerves—it jolted markets, sending a fresh wave of capital sprinting for cover. With energy infrastructure under threat and oil firming on the back of transit risk, the spillover into safe havens like bullion was swift and forceful.

The geopolitical fuse may have been lit by conflict, but gold’s rally has deeper fuel: economic anxiety and policy risk. Trump’s second-term tariff crusade is already distorting global trade flows, raising fears of another demand shock just as the global cycle looked ready to roll over. Central banks, wary of being caught long dollars into a political storm, continue to diversify into bullion—adding structural weight behind the breakout.

Add in dovish Fed bets after soft CPI and job prints, and you’ve got the makings of a perfect storm. Friday’s 1.4% rip capped a three-day surge that sent bond yields lower and gold soaring. With real yields dipping and the dollar still licking its wounds after last week’s 0.8% drop, the setup remains gold-positive, even with today’s modest bounce in the greenback.

Spot gold sits at $3,446 as of early Singapore trade, within striking distance of April’s record. Silver is treading water, while platinum and palladium are catching the tailwind. But the message from the tape is clear: fear is back on the board, and gold’s not waiting around for confirmation—it’s leading the charge.

---

Regime Roulette: Israel Bets Big, Tehran Bleeds—but Don’t Count Out the Ayatollah’s Hand Just Yet

Israel didn’t just fire missiles last Friday—it played a kingmaker card in a long-running geopolitical poker game, aiming squarely at the head of the Iranian regime. Netanyahu’s follow-up was no mere chest thumping; it was a calculated broadcast into the heart of enemy territory. “This isn’t about you, it’s about them,” he told the Iranian people—flipping the script from a military strike into a psychological operation designed to peel the regime from within.

This wasn’t a raid. It was a strategic body blow—precision hits on Tehran’s elite command structure, its infrastructure, and its sense of control. It’s the most direct assault on Iran’s sovereignty since Saddam’s tanks rolled across the border in 1980. And unlike past shadow skirmishes, this was out in the open—on Iranian soil, under Israeli fingerprints.

The message? This is Israel’s endgame: decapitate Iran’s regional command, cripple its deterrent capability, and push a fragile, sanction-choked theocracy to the brink of implosion. And from Tel Aviv’s view, the stars are aligning. Tehran is cash-starved, its currency shredded, inflation is spiraling, and the streets of north Tehran are gridlocked with families fleeing to the Caspian like it’s 1979 all over again.

But here’s the market angle—this conflict isn’t just about missiles and messages. It’s about energy security, nuclear tail risk, and macro disruption in every global asset class.

Crude spiked 13% on the initial strike—Brent posting its biggest one-day move since the early days of Ukraine’s war. And yet, oil is still trading under $75. That’s the disconnect—one that screams underpricing of geopolitical risk. If the Strait of Hormuz becomes Tehran’s pressure valve, $130 oil isn’t fantasy—it’s the base case.

Meanwhile, Iran’s leadership is walking a tightrope between retaliation and implosion. Fire back too hard, and Trump gets pulled into the war. Hold back, and they risk looking like a paper tiger. Behind the scenes, the Iranian elite is shell-shocked—Israel didn’t just hit military targets; it humiliated the regime by striking into the capital with surgical precision. Reports say top IRGC brass are already heading for the exits. Markets should be watching that more than missile counts.

Netanyahu knows this. That’s why he’s speaking in regime-toppling tones, calling out birthday greetings to Trump while simultaneously warning Iran’s leaders that Israeli pilots are circling their bunkers.

But Iran isn’t out of the game. It still holds a stockpile of ballistic missiles, Red Sea proxy power via the Houthis, and the ultimate market grenade: closure of the Strait of Hormuz. And while it’s unlikely Tehran will push that button immediately—it knows that move could alienate its newly mended Gulf ties—it remains the ace up their sleeve.

The nuclear angle adds a second fuse. Israel’s strikes could backfire by triggering hardline calls inside Iran to abandon ambiguity and make a nuclear dash. That risk isn't priced either. Every trader betting on normalization is playing with matches near an open fuel line.

Meanwhile, Trump—always the wildcard—arrives at the G-7 summit in Canada holding multiple contradictory positions. On one hand, he’s vetoed a decap strike on Khamenei, preaching restraint. On the other, he’s telling ABC News the U.S. might get involved—and that Iran and Israel should “make a deal.” For markets, that means one thing: uncertainty is institutionalized.

Tehran’s recent performance under pressure shows a regime that’s hurt—but far from hollow. It's survived sanctions, assassinations, cyber sabotage, and war before. And while Israel might want regime change, history suggests nothing rallies Iran’s base like an outside enemy.

Still, the balance is fragile. Another refinery strike, a flashpoint in the Red Sea, or a miscalculated Hezbollah response—and this spirals beyond targeted containment. The market, still anchored to a wait-and-see narrative, is grossly underpricing the fat tail: a multi-front regional war with oil, nukes, and great power proxies all in the mix.

This isn't just geopolitics. This is the live fire drill for markets—one where every barrel, bond, and basis point is back in play. The narrative may be regime collapse. The risk is systemic spillover. And the trade? Stay long volatility—this hand’s far from played out.

---

G-7 Kananaskis: Summit or Standoff? Markets Eye Trump’s Trade Cards Amid Middle East Turmoil

The circus is back in town, and the ringleader is Donald Trump—touching down in Kananaskis, Alberta, with all the subtlety of a margin call. This isn’t your standard G-7 summit—it’s a geopolitical poker game where everyone’s bluffing but only Trump’s holding live ammo. With missiles flying in the Middle East and tariffs cocked and loaded back home, this gathering of global heavyweights isn’t about forging unity—it’s about surviving the weekend without triggering another global risk-off move.

Forget unity statements. The old G-7 consensus model is DOA. Ukraine? Too divisive. Climate? A side show. AI, trade, energy independence—sure, they’ll get mentioned—but the subtext is clear: the real game is mollifying Trump, keeping him from slapping a fresh round of “reciprocal tariffs” on nearly five dozen countries and the EU. July 9 is the strike date, and the market’s already front-running that tape.

Meanwhile, the Middle East is smoldering. Israel’s strikes on Iranian nuclear infrastructure lit a geopolitical fuse, and over the weekend that fuse kept burning. The question on every FX and energy trader’s radar: will Trump lean into escalation, or will he play global referee? So far, he’s split the difference—urging calm publicly, backing Israel quietly, and dialing up Putin for a weekend call that has left allies more rattled than reassured. Macron’s already waved off any Russian mediation as a joke, and the rest of the G-7 isn’t even pretending to coordinate a common stance. It’s a classic Trump setup: all eyes on him, allies scrambling, risk premiums leaking into oil and gold as traders watch for the next surprise headline.

At the same time, the G-7 venue—a remote, camera-free Canadian lodge—is pure market theater. No photo ops, no Oval Office optics. Just a neutral zone where leaders like Brazil’s Lula, South Korea’s Yoon, and India’s Modi are quietly shopping trade deals, hoping to dodge tariff grenades. Even Zelenskiy is parachuting in, looking to keep Ukraine on the radar despite Trump’s ambivalence. Mexico’s Sheinbaum and host PM Mark Carney are pushing for a revamped North American trade pact—while also navigating Trump’s past barbs about turning Canada into the 51st state.

It’s not lost on anyone that the ghost of Charlevoix 2018 still haunts this summit. That infamous photo—Trump seated, arms crossed, Merkel and the rest leaning in—set the tone for the Trump-era summit playbook: no joint statements, no automatic consensus, and no guarantees that what’s agreed behind closed doors won’t get torpedoed on X before dessert.

This year, markets aren’t even pretending this is about a collective vision. It’s about deal-making, damage control, and figuring out whether Trump’s tariff clock stops ticking—or goes full auto. Japanese PM Ishiba is negotiating weekly just to keep auto levies off the table, signaling just how transactional this summit has become. Everyone’s hedging—literally and diplomatically.

From a market lens, this isn’t just diplomatic theatre—it’s macro volatility in waiting. Between potential oil spikes , a tariff drag on global trade, and the fragmentation of what used to be the free world’s steering committee, investors are staring at a landscape where alliances are fluid, policies are now social media soundbites, and fundamentals take a backseat to geopolitical brinkmanship.

So if you’re looking for coordinated action out of Kananaskis, don’t. What you’ll get is a G-7 of one: Trump, once again the gravitational center of a summit where risk is the only universal language. And for traders? Every handshake, snub, or “off-the-record” moment might as well be a trigger for your next macro position.